The Advertiser (Adelaide) Friday 13 January 1911 THE WARATAH.
MORE EXPERT EVIDENCE!
LONDON, January 12.
The enquiry concerning the loss of theLund liner Waratah was continued yesterday.
Captain Bidwell, marine superintendentfor Messrs. W. Lund & Sons, testified that after the first voyage of the Waratah Captain Ilbery and his officers eulogised the vessel and made no complaint concerning her "tenderness." He did not remember telling Mr. Lund that the Waratah was less stable than the steamer Geelong. The witness added that Captain Ilbery treated the rumors on the subject which were prevalent among the clerks in Lund & Sons' office as mere idle talk. (This gives an indication that the teething stability issues experienced by the Waratah on her maiden voyage, were well known within the Blue Anchor Line offices, despite what Captain Bidwell said.)
Vice-Admiral Davis, who is a member of the Court of Enquiry, quoted the letter of Mr. Hodder, the chief engineer, to Mr. Shanks, superintendent engineer to Messrs. Lund & Sons, concerning the difficulties experienced in coaling the Waratah at Sydney, which had compelled the captain twice to stop coaling because he was afraid of the possible list of the vessel.
Captain Bidwell replied, "Captain Ilberytold me nothing about this." (What could coaling problems relating to a light, unloaded Waratah in port possibly have to do with the stability of a fully loaded Waratah departing Durban?)
Captain Bidwell continued that he was unable to explain why the ballast tanks, which were full on the first voyage, were left empty on the second homeward-trip from Durban. (Perhaps because the Waratah was deeply overloaded, creating sufficient ballast weight.)
At this stage the depositions of Mr. Latimer, tally clerk at Sydney, giving the second officer's opinion that the Waratah had a deck too many; of the Sydney pilots, informing Captain Ilbery that the vessel was tender; and of Lusakin, the steward, showing that the boatswain told him that the lifeboats were the most awful he had ever seen, were read. (A deck too many ? - the Waratah was merely an example of progress. Many new steamers of the time were fitted with an extra superstructure deck. As for lifeboats, the tragedy is that they were redundant.)
Several witnesses from the steamer Tottenham corroborated the previous evidence regarding bodies being seen floating in the water. The third officer of the Tottenham said the captain had enjoined silence, remarking that his owners would have a poor opinion of him if he had bothered to pick up and convey the bodies to the nearest port when other vessels were specially searching. (This is arguably the darkest hour of the search for signs of the Waratah. 'Bothered to pick up and convey bodies' sticks in one's throat and was a very cruel blow delivered to a great many people who were utterly desperate to confirm the truth of what had become of their loved ones.)
Saunders, who was a stowaway on the Waratah on a previous voyage, said the behaviour of the Waratah had scared him, and he believed the vessel was bound to topple over in a squall. Other witnesses testified that the steamer was a comfortable ship. (This does not say much for the accommodation offered to stowaways.)
Trott, who was the cook on the maiden voyage, said he thought the ship would not stand too much punishment, but be was not frightened in her. (This is an interesting and seemingly contradictory statement. I interpret it to mean that Trott was not frightened because the Waratah, 1909, was not the only vessel which would not have 'stood too much punishment'. We forget in the modern era that steamships were vulnerable and a great many succumbed to the perils of the sea.)
Mr. Scott, counsel for Messrs. William Lund, stated that when the firm sold out to the P.& O. Company some documents were handed over and some probably were destroyed, resulting in confusion whichhad enhanced the difficulty of tracing the documents. If ever there was a statement which cast aspersions on the integrity of the Lunds, it must surely be this. They were acutely aware, well before the Blue Anchor Line was sold to the P&O Line, that documents relating to the Waratah would be of vital importance during the Inquiry, December, 1910. It is very surprising that the Lunds were able to get away with this. How were they able to exert such influence and power to their advantage at the Inquiry????
Mr. Guthrie (S.A.) asked if, in view ofthe anxiety felt in Australia on account ofthe Waratah and her stability, the Government would cause an enquiry to be heldinto the stability of ships taking peopleto other parts of the world. As tragic as the loss of the Waratah was, it is heartening that proactive steps were taken to make wireless installation on steamers of a certain size compulsory and measures taken to minimise instability - including cargo overloading! “I know most of the time it's hard to keep in mind - from lessons learned comes better life.” ― Conditions If there was one seminal legacy from the Waratah tragedy, it must be the lessons learned and improvements made in the interests of both progress and the safety of those at the mercy of perils of the seas.
The Argus (Melbourne) Saturday 4 September, 1909 THE MISSING WARATAH.
COMMONWEALTH ACTION.CHARTER OF A VESSEL.
EXPENSES TO BE SHARED.
In moving the adjournment of the Houseof Representatives yesterday afternoon, Mr Deakin said that it was only fair to place the House in possession of the facts relating to the proposed search for the Waratah. Messrs John Sanderson and Co had forwarded the following statement to Sir Robert Best (Minister for Customs) -
Referring to the interviews which we havehad with you, and the cables which have passedbetween Messrs W. Lund and Sons, the owners ofthis steamer, we herewith hand you a copy of theexact cables, which have passed between us, andfrom these we understand that Messrs W. Lund andsons are at present in negotiations for a suitablesteamer to make a search for the Waratah, thatshe will be chartered for a period of about threemonths to make a thorough search, that theyheartily agree to your suggestion that the costof the search steamer should be divided equally be-tween the Commonwealth Government, subscriptions from the friends of the passengers, the underwriters, and the owners themselves. The estimated cost of the whole thing, we reckon, should not be more than £6 000. This, therefore, would require a contribution from each of these of £1 500. We understand from the cables which have passed that Messrs W. Lund and Sons are quite agreeable to find their quarter, and we take it also for granted that they have arranged with the underwriters to find theirs. We will, however, make this latter point quite clear in a cable we are sending tonight as regards the subscriptions from the passengers' friends, this is a matter which is at present in the hands of the president of the Chamber of Commerce and we understand from him that from negotiations he has had with several of the passengers' friends, there is no doubt at all that the money will be forthcoming."
'The enclosures with this communication were as follow -
Copy of cable to W. Lund and Sons,dated August 31, 1909 -
"Chamber of Commerce is urging AustralianCommonwealth arrange for steamer to search forWaratah, to be despatched from South Africa. Government will probably agree to subscribe equivalent to public and passengers' friends' subscriptions. Cabinet considers matter tomorrow morning. For their information telegraph immediately whether suitable cargo steamer at present available for time charter in South Africa, also state approximate price monthly, including coals"
Copy of reply received same date - "Replying to your telegram soon as possible "
Copy of cable to W. Lund and Sons(September 1) -
"Government ask us to obtain firm offer timecharter, suitable searching steamer and chartererssharing salvage only to extent of their outlay.Reply by 10 am tomorrow. "
Copy of cable to W. Lund and Sons(September 2) -
"Proposal is that searching steamer should bechartered, and also coaled for period up to threemonths. On our estimate, cost would not exceed£6 000. Government idea, this should be dividedbetween Government, subscribers, owners, andunderwriters, one fourth each. What is your idea?If you agree, we immediately very probably authorise you fix charter in name of yourselves. Weguarantee Government's and subscribers' shares.Ministry here very anxious, made announcementParliament to allay public impatience Thereforetelegraph very fully what is present position ofnegotiations."
Copy of cable from W. Lund and Sons,London, September 2 -
"Heartily agree to proposal. It will be fewdays before anything can be arranged. We willsubmit terms for confirmation as soon as possible. "
Mr Deakin said that the public subscriptions could only be guaranteed by those who answered the appeal. The Commonwealth undertook to find £ for £ on the public subscriptions.
Mr. Morrow - Will the despatch of thesteamer be delayed until the subscriptions have come in'
Mr Deakin -The financial arrangements were almost completed, and the arrangements for the steamer were proceeding. In the days which followed 27 July, and the Waratah failed to arrive at Cape Town, the Lunds made it publicly known they believed the Waratah to have suffered mechanical failure and was adrift, following prevailing currents. Anything less than this would have implied the Waratah had foundered, opening a can of legal worms in terms of her seaworthiness, or the skills of her crew. The Lunds had no choice but to witness and participate financially in the unprecedented searches at sea for the missing Waratah. Personally I believe they were caught between a rock and a hard place. The Lunds had no choice but to show good faith by supporting searches at sea even though they strongly suspected the Waratah had gone to a watery grave. Their responses to the alleged accounts of both the Guelph and Harlow demonstrated the degree to which they were committed to searches, their only option. In all this time, friends and family of those on the Waratah, were subjected to protracted hope, that glimmer in dark endless nights their loved ones would be discovered and rescued. The searches continued into 1910, but finally after the last vestiges of hope were placed in the hands of the crew of SS Wakefield, a further 3 month search covering extensive areas of the southern Indian Ocean, it became clear that no trace of a floating Waratah was ever to be found. The Lunds were instrumental in perpetuating this foolish hope and in the process helped steer the authorities and public away from exploring the Guelph and Harlow accounts more fully. Time was of the essence, but it was lost, never to be recovered by the opening of the Inquiry, December, 1910. If the Lunds and authorities had acted differently, making a bold decision to assume that the Waratah had foundered, perhaps more would have been achieved and we would not have the mystery we have today.
Clarence and Richmond Examiner (Grafton) Tuesday 14 December 1909 THE FATE OF THE WARATAH. The captain of the British steamer, Harlow, declares that on the evening of July 27, when about 8 hoursout from Durban, he sighted a steamersmoking fiercely. She appeared, to thecaptain of the Harlow, to be steaming muchfaster than his own vessel, and he couldsee her red light distinctly and two masthead lights. This day, 106 years ago, the Waratah bade farewell to the steamer SS Clan MacIntyre (off Cape Hermes). This was to be the last official exchange with the Waratah before she steamed out of sight in a more southerly direction than the course tracked by the Clan MacIntyre. Crew of the Clan MacIntyre first sighted the flagship proceeding closer to shore (according to some sources - debatable) at about 4 am. The Waratah was then seen to change course, heading in a more southerly direction, until she was a short distance from the Clan MacIntyre at about 6 am, when signals were exchanged. Continuing on her more southerly course, the Waratah (faster by at least 3 knots), crossed the bow of the Clan MacIntyre from starboard to port and faded out of sight by about 9.30 am. What became of the Lund liner after this remains in the realm of conjecture. There are a number of well known theories explaining her disappearance, but readers of this blog will know that I believe that a fire on board and the ferocity of an approaching cold front gale, forced Captain Ilbery to bring the Waratah about, a valiant attempt to navigate the Waratah and her souls safely back to the protection of Port Natal. To cut a long story shorter, Captain Bruce of the SS Harlow, maintained (even when those around him wavered) that he sighted what could only have been the Waratah coming up astern in the vicinity of Cape Hermes at dusk (roughly 5.30 pm). The steamer was a good distance astern, but Bruce immediately was given the impression that she was large and faster - but more importantly, displayed visual clues there was a fire on board. By 8 pm, the steamer astern disappeared after two flashes of light were witnessed by at least 3 crew members on board the Harlow. In this report, Captain Bruce clearly saw a port side red light associated with the steamer before she disappeared. I have mentioned that it is unlikely that bush fires and the light from Cape Hermes lighthouse could mimic a red port side light and two white masthead lights. In order for the crew of the Harlow to have seen a red port side light just before the steamer disappeared (4 to 5 miles astern) suggests that the Waratah was either further out from shore relative to the Harlow or: - the crisis on board reached a catastrophic level and an attempt was made to approach shore off the mouth of the Umzimvubu River, with a view to beaching the Waratah and landing her souls. The currents, sandbar and reefs presented a very real danger which probably outweighed the potential success of beaching the Waratah safely at that location. My feeling is that the Waratah had approached too close to the sandbar / reefs forcing Captain Ilbery to reconsider and alter course away from shore. This would have given the crew of the Harlow an oblique port-side view of the Waratah, and 'seen her red light distinctly' shortly before she went down. I believe the Waratah struck an object, her hull integrity failed and she foundered rapidly; described by the crew of the Harlow, 'once the smoke cleared, there was no sign of the steamer'. In my opinion, by the close of 27 July, 1909, the Waratah had foundered off Cape Hermes.
the inaccuracies depicted in this image add to the mystery surrounding the great ship.